Millennium Goal Seventh,
The Environmental Sustainability

Muhammad Yasin Hatif*, Advocate Supreme Court

The progress of country to a great extent is measured by its industrial development. To survive in the world, every country needs to be noticed and respected for what it produces and contributes to the world market. Although the other factors too involved in the progress but still those factors alone cannot take the country forward. Unfortunately, in our country the industry and other sectors are on the verge to deplete and no potential efforts have been made to revive the industry. The author has to face strong opposition in one of his cases when representative of the local Environmental Protection Agency (the “Agency”) addressed the court stating to foreclose industry to replenish the environment until the same qualify for the required National Environmental Quality Standard (NEQS). The presumption attached to this approach is rebuttable and does not seem viable.

The concept of sustainable development is derived from the German term “Sustained Yield” in the year 1713.1 According to the different sources, the concept of sustainability in the sense of a balance between resource consumption and reproduction was however applied to foresty in the 12th to 16th century. The notion underlying the concept is that the sustained yield of timber is as aspect of man’s most fundamental need to sustain life.2

Dictionary meaning of “sustain” is to support or maintain, especially over a long period 3 and “development” means an activity, action, or alteration that changes undeveloped property into developed property.4 A modern concept with deep historical roots linking the verb ‘sustain’ with the suffix ‘-able’ and coupling it with ‘development’ was certainly a semantic innovation.5

Mr. Justice Brian J. Preston 6 has described the Principle of “Ecologically sustainable development” that the concept of sustainable development involves a cluster of elements

or principles, six are worth highlighting:

  1. Principle of sustainable use;
  2. Principle of integration;
  3. Precautionary principle;
  4. Inter-generational and intra-generational equity;
  5. Conservation of biological diversity and ecology integrity; and
  6. Internalisation of external environmental costs.

The merit to have introduced the term ‘sustainable’ into political language, however, belongs to the Club of Rome.7 In March 1972, this globally operating think-tank published the epoch-making report on the ‘Limits to Growth’, written by a group of scientists, led by Dennis and Donella Meadows of the ‘Massachusetts Institute of Technology’ (MIT). Describing the desirable “state of global equilibrium”, the authors used the word ‘sustainable’: “We are searching for a model output that represents a world system that is: 1. sustainable without sudden and uncontrolled collapse; and 2. capable of satisfying the basic material requirements of all of its people.”8

As a matter of fact, “sustainable development” entered the Global stage during the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro. The United Nations presented it as their strategic concept for shaping and indeed saving the future of the blue planet”.9

In Australia, the adjective “sustainable” is qualified by the word “ecologically” to emphasise the necessary integration of economy and environment.10

In 1987, the United Nations General Assembly released the Report of Brundtland Commission on Environment and Development (the “Report”) formally known as “World Commission on Environment and Development”11 which included the most widely recognized definition of the sustainable development as”

Sustainable Development, which implies meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs, should become a central guiding principle of the United Nations, Governments and private institutions,organizations and enterprises”/12

The Report further states that to address the major environmental problems, the common interest of all countries to pursue policies aimed at sustainable development and environmentally sound development. The General Assembly agree with the Report that while seeking to remedy existing environmental problems, it is imperative to influence the sources of those problems in human activity and economic activity in particular, and thus to provide for sustainable development.

In June, 1992, sustainable development served as the central theme of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), the largest diplomatic conference ever held. The UNCED brought leaders and representatives from 180 countries to Rio de Janerio, Brazil “to elaborate strategies and measures to halt and reverse the effects of environmental degradation,………..to promote sustainable and environmentally sound development in all countries.13

While submitting Report to congress on sustainable development, United States Environmental Protection Agency elaborated the precise meaning of sustainable development in three tenants “first the sustainable development requires a long term perspective for planning and policy development; secondly sustainable development must build on and reinforce the independence of our economy and our environment and thirdly the sustainable development calls for new, integrative approaches to achieve economic, social and environmental objectives.14

Then again in 2005, the United Nations General Assembly at “World Summit” 15 refers the sustainable development as economic development, social development and environment protection. Even the indigenous people by using the United Nations platform on Biological Diversity declares the forth pillar of sustainable the “Culture” and the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO 2001)16 further elaborates the concept by stating that Cultural diversity is as necessary for human kind as biodiversity is for nature.

The values and principles of sustainable have also been enshrined in the “Earth Charter”17 which offer an integrated vision and definition of strong sustainability.

The United Nations Division for sustainable development lists the areas as coming within the scope of sustainable development.18 Sustainable development is an eclectic concept, as a wide array of views fall under its umbrella. The concept has included notions of weak sustainability, strong sustainability and deep ecology19 and “Sustainable development is a strategy for allowing progress to occur without destroying the environment” 19A.

The field of sustainable development constitutes three parts-environmental sustainability, economic sustainability and social sustainability. Sustainable practices requires that we use natural resources at a rate lower or equal to the rate nature can replenish them so that whatever damage is done to environment can be recovered by nature though natural recovery.20

The framer of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 (the “PEPA 1997”) and subsequently the Punjab Environmental Protection (Amended) Act 2012 (the “Act 2012”) have incorporated the idea of sustainable development from the definition of Brundtland Commission Repot but have failed to appreciate industrial development in the country. If the definition clause has been appreciated from the Report, the later resolutions of the United Nations on this issue should also be followed in its true perspective.

Even the United Nations Industrial Development Organization in Vienna 2004 included the notion of sustainable development in its Millennium Goals and states that the Organization can make a critical direct contribution, through its various technical cooperation and global forum activities, to the achievement of four of the eight Millennium Development Goals (“MDG”) including the MDG 7, “to ensure environmental sustainability”.21

On Sustainable development widely accepted trend is the liability of the present generation to save the future generation to make sure that the current processes of interaction with the environment are pursued with the idea to keep the environment as pristine as naturally possible.

The major threat to sustainability is the environmental degradation. Such degeradation22 on a global scale could imply extinction for humanity. To cope with the situation and to strike a balance to achieve sustainable development without collapse of the industrial sector, the state of equilibrium is necessary and the presumption “to sustain balance” in the current scenario apparently seems to be feasible. Three positions might arise while dealing with the cases of environment. First, is the degradation wherein the concept of sustainability vanished when consumption of renewable resources are at a level more than nature’s ability to replenish. Second, the state of equilibrium when consumption of renewable resources are equal to the nature’s ability to replenish and the third one which could be the ideal stage where consumption of renewable resources are less than the nature’s ability to replenish. These three stages i.e. the degradation, equilibrium and renewal might be the yardstick to gauge the level of environmental measures.

The underlying concept behind sustainable development is to avoid degradation. Second stage amongst the three stages supports the concept of equilibrium and by propagating that very concept, the closedown of industry could be avoided in line with the definition of Brundtland Commission. Although, if there is cause for deep concern, there is cause for hope too and the third stage apparently seems to be an ideal one must be appreciated in context for achieving required objectives but sustainability, after having gone through the preceding definition and conferences on the same, does not mean an end to progress or compromise on ecology or to unbalance the stability of the system rather sustainability in light of second stage i.e. “to strike a balance” where consumption of renewable resources are equal to nature’s ability to replenish without sudden and uncontrolled collapse to the industry.

Economic growth and development obviously involve changes in the physical ecosystem. Every ecosystem everywhere cannot be preserved intact.23 A development path that combines growth with reduced vulnerability is more sustainable than one that does not.24 The PEPA 1997 as well as the Act 2012 establishes a clear presumption in favour of sustainable development in its preamble25 and in the definition clause; however,  the fundamental principle of sustainable development that is “to balance the ecology and industry” or the “economy, society and environment” is absent from the said statues. The Hon’ble High Court has comprehended the notion of sustainable

development in Shehri C. B. E. versus Government of Pakistan26 that:

“It is essential to maintain a balance between industrialization and ecology and that development and environmental protection must progress, it is in consonance with such principle that Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 has been enacted and enforced and thus its mandate should be honoured in its true letter and spirit”

The notion of sustainable development has been a low priority for the Agency which, of course, is a divergence from the gateway to sustain balance. To achieve the balance many techniques and methods could be implemented; amongst those the environmental monitoring might be the effective way to avoid disintegration. Monitoring is a steady method which could be appreciated until the state of equilibrium is attained for restructuring industries. To make this process transparent, the neutral body should be employed which may consist of technicians/experts to examine the environmental hazard and such body may recommend to the proponent the protective measures to be adopted in a particular time frame and if so consented by the proponent might achieve the level of equilibrium and in case failure to meet the goal due to non cooperation by the proponent, the proponent might face stiff penalties by the competent authority.

Environmental Sustainability can’t be achieved without vital co-operation of the Agency. The preceding Acts provides umbrella to achieve these objectives. The relevant provisions of the said Acts entail schemes and system to be adopted by the proponents and the Agency is to supplement them to improve environment and even the Agency is bound “to take measures to promote research and the development of science and technology which may contribute to the prevention of pollution, protection of environment, and sustainable development”27.

The environmental sustainability must be appreciated as a first priority and if the wheel of progress is to continue, the balance between industry and ecology is necessary and the Agency should keep in place sufficiently detailed and clear guidance that enables communities, developers and regulators to ensure that sustainable development is central to local decision making and that a planning system with guidance as provided in the PEPA 1997 as well as the Act 2012 is in place that protects the natural environment.

*The writer is an environmental lawyer and activist practicing in corporate, commercial and constitutional law. He has worked in the field of environment for more than a decade and has acted as pro bono publico too by filing constitutional petitions on different environmental issues. Apart from this, he is visiting faculty, teaching environmental laws, in the University of the Punjab. The Article published in law journal “PLD October Journal 2012”

  1. Ina Ehnert: “Sustainable Human Resource Management”: A conceptual and Explanatory Analysis from a Paradox perspective:” Physica-Verlag. Springer Company: Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
  2. Ina Ehnert: “Sustainable Human Resource Management”: A conceptual and Explanatory Analysis from a Paradox perspective:” Physica-Verlag. Springer Company: Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
  3. Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, By Bryan A. Garner, Pages 1461& 462.
  4. Black’s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, By Bryan A. Garner, Pages 1461& 462.
  5. Simonis, U.E.: Nachhaltigkeit in internationaler Sicht – Festvortrag,

in: Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege, Heft 74, Bonn:

DRL, 2003, pp. 2-9.

  1. Brian J. Preston (born 10 July 1958) is the Chief Judge of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.
  2. Meadows, D. et. al.: The Limits to Growth, London: Potomac Associates, 1972, p. 158.
  3.  
  4. Ulrich Grober: Deep Roots” A conceptual history of “Sustainable development” Beim Prasidenten: Emeriti Projekte Feb 2007.
  5. .http://www.lec.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/agdbasev7wr/_assets/lec/m420301l721754/preston_principles%20of%20ecologically%20sustainable%20development.pdf
  6. The Brundtland Commission’s mission is to unite countries to pursue sustainable development. The United Nations General Assembly on Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development bearing 42/187 in 96th Plenary meeting at 11 December, 1987 recognized in view of the global character of major environmental problems, the common interest of all countries to pursue policies aim at sustainable and environmentally sound development.
  7. United Nations General Assembly. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/area42-187.htm.
  8. United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Resolution44/228. (New York:22 December 1989)
  9. Sustainable Development and the Environmental Protection Agency Report to Congress. Policy planning and Evaluation (PM-219) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Page 2
  10. “Interdependence and mutually reinforcing pillars”http://www.who.int/hiv/universalaccess2010/worldsummit.pdf
  11. .http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
    1. http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html.
    2. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development-Document:Sustainable Development Issues (http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documnets/doc-sdisscues.Retrieved.htm)
    3. (VisualizingSustainability)http://computingforsustainability.wordpress.com/2009/03/15visualising-sustainability/

    19A.Environmental Science “A system approach to sustainable development”  By Daniel D. Chriras. Page 6

    1. environmnet.about.com
    2. United Naitons Industrial Development Organization Vienna, 2004, “The Role of Industrial Development in the Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, Vienna 1-3 December 2003, Compendium Edition.
    3. Environmental Degradation occurs when humans start exploiting a freely available natural resource beyond a limit from where natural recovery isn’t possible…..
    4. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm.
    5. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm.
    6. Preamble is gateway to any statute; it is bedrock to understand the scope, purpose and object of any statute. [PLD 2010 Kari 236] [PLD 2007 Kari 293]
    7. 2007 CLD 783 (Karachi) at page 801
    8. Section 6 (1) (J) of the PEPA 1997 as well as Act 2012

PLASTIC POLLUTION-IMPACTS
OF HOSPITAL WASTE

By Muhammad Yasin Hatif*
LL.M. (London)
Advocate Supreme Court

Plastic pollution is one of major problems faced by the world at large. Plastic by its composition is not inherently good object as it has significant adverse impacts on the environment in shape of air, water and land pollution effecting ecosystem and aquatic life. The 5th June 2019 of the world environment day was celebrated as the year of plastic pollution faced by our planet. A vile threat to human health, from plastics causing adversely, is the recycled plastic from the hospital waste. The impacts of this plastic is unprecedented effecting health and life.

Toys manufactured from the recycled hospital waste are not only hazardous1 but injurious to health of the children across most part of the country. The Federal and Provincial governments have not controlled the recycled hospital waste widely used for plastic toys, utensils and alike products which retains toxic impurities, by the plastic manufacturers.

According to a study1A conducted the toxic substances released from various plastic products includes phthalates2,3 brominated flame retardants (BFRs)4, BPA5,6, bisphenol-A dimethacrylate7, lead, tin and cadmium8, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde9 nonylphenol10,

MTBE (methyl tertbutyl ether), benzene11 and many other volatile organic compounds12. In several of these studies the concentrations released are low compared to the guideline/legal limit values, but there are also occasions where they are considerably higher. Notably, the guideline values do not consider the low levels at which endocrine disrupting chemicals may be in effect and also do not consider the toxicity of mixtures.13

 

Chemical toxicity at a very early stage of life can reprogrammed development and makes the kids more susceptible to diseases later in life. This health hazardous issue is due to inaction on the part of the public functionaries where children are using, highly contaminated recycled plastic made, toys at large and cups, plates, spoons and other articles by the public, in common in a very attractive and fascinating colour scheme, available in the market. Food gets processed on plastic equipment, and packaged and shipped in plastic-lined boxes and cans. At home we store and reheat the leftovers in plastic containers. The users are unaware of contaminants leached from the products made from material effecting human body and tissues which are directly exposed to contaminants and resultantly suffering from chronic diseases.

 

The risk associated with the use of the recycled plastic has shocking revelation causing cancer, severe illness, endocrine disrupter causing birth defects, irritation in the eye, vision failure, breathing difficulties, respiratory problems, liver dysfunction, skin diseases, lungs problems, dizziness, reproductive, cardiovascular, genotoxic, and gastrointestinal causes for using toxic plastics.14

 

The toxic effects of the toys and utensils manufactured from the polyethylene products directly penetrate into the human tissues causing cancer, endomic skin sensitization, reproductive toxicity, skin corrosion, sometimes acute toxicity15. The children are more susceptible to those toxic effects of chemicals in toys manufactured from such recycled plastic as they likely to put things in their mouths which increase their exposure to more risk.

 

The plastic used in making toys both before and after recycling have serious effects on human health. The plastic used in the process of manufacturing toys is not free from pollutants and chemicals. Even, the process of incineration results in emission of dioxins, furans,16,17 and other particulate matters. Incineration is considered to be the safe process to dispose of hospital waste. It is a controlled combustion process for burning solid wastes in

presence of excess air (oxygen) at high temperature of about 1000 oC or above to produce gases and residue containing non-combustible material. According to the study which has revealed the preceding facts  also states that one of the most attractive features of incineration process is that it can be used to reduce the original volume of combustible material by 80– 90%.

 

The Products used in hospitals for medical procedures contain pathogenic microorganisms and other hazardous substances, meaning that they pose a threat to human health, as well as the natural environment by leaching into soil and waterways. Many medical products are made of polypropylene and polyethylene. Medical waste after recycling are used to convert into pellets and sold online to plastic factories around the world18.

 

According to the statistical standards of the World Health Organization (WHO), only about 15% of medical waste generated from healthcare activities is toxic and harmful,19 while the rest is  mostly ordinary and harmless waste. The general and hazardous waste and by-products cover a diverse range of materials20 which include Infectious waste contaminated with blood and other bodily fluids (e.g. from discarded diagnostic samples), cultures and stocks of infectious agents from laboratory work, genotoxic or radioactive, the pathological waste, sharps (needles, syringes, scalpels, knives, broken glass etc; Cytotoxic waste containing substances with genotoxic properties such as cytotoxic drugs used in cancer treatment and their metabolites. Presently there is no statistical data on medical waste; however, the estimated quantities of medical waste are extrapolated using bed occupancy and number of beds in health institutions21.

The sources which generate these health-care wastes, as per World Health Organization22, are hospitals and other health facilities, laboratories, research centers, mortuary, autopsy centers, animal research, testing laboratories, blood banks, collection services; and nursing homes for the elderly.

According to WHO the disposal of untreated health care wastes in landfills can lead to the contamination of drinking, surface, and ground waters if those landfills are not properly constructed and similarly the treatment of health care wastes with chemical disinfectants can result in the release of chemical substances into the environment if these substances are not handled, stored and disposed in an environmentally sound manner, so, Incineration of waste has been widely practiced but inadequate incineration or the incineration of unsuitable materials results in the release of pollutants into the air and in the generation of ash residue. Incinerated materials containing or treated with chlorine can generate dioxins and furans, which are human carcinogens and have been associated with a range of adverse health effects. Incineration of heavy metals or materials with high metal content (in particular lead, mercury and cadmium) can lead to the spread of toxic metals in the environment. Only

modern incinerators operating at 850-1100°C 22 and fitted with special gas-cleaning equipment are able to comply with the international emission standards for dioxins and furans. Alternatives to incineration such as autoclaving, microwaving, steam treatment integrated with internal mixing, which minimize the formation and release of chemicals or hazardous emissions should be given consideration in settings where there are sufficient resources to operate and maintain such systems and dispose of the treated waste.22

The research study based on the Hospital waste have shocking revelations which enshrined that the use of hospital waste particularly the recycled plastic waste is serious threat to health and life of people. A mini review23 on Hospital waste management in developing countries states on the cited subject that developing countries are resource-constrained when it comes to safe management of hospital wastes. The article summarizes the main issues faced in hospital waste management in developing countries. A review of the existing literature suggests that regulations and legislations focusing on hospital waste management are recent accomplishments in many of these countries. Implementation of these rules varies from one hospital to another. Moreover, wide variations exist in waste generation rates within as well as across these countries. This is mainly attributable to a lack of an agreement on the definitions and the methodology among the researchers to measure such wastes. Furthermore, hospitals in these countries suffer from poor waste segregation, collection, storage, transportation and disposal practices, which can lead to occupational and environmental risks.

In Belgium, Martin Wagner, a toxicologist at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, says that it is a misconception to assume bioplastics are safer. Most health concerns about plastics are linked to plastic additives, chemicals added to give polymers desirable properties, like flexibility and durability. “There are very few polymers that come with little added chemicals because they simply don’t work without added chemicals,” Wagner says. “They are needed for bio-based plastics and conventional plastics.” The most well-known plastic additive is Bisphenol A, or “BPA”, an endocrine disrupter that has been linked to developmental and birth defects, and other health issues. Research has shown that these compounds can leach from plastics into the food and drinks that we consume-more so if they are heated to high temperatures, raising additional concerns about the kinds of plastics that are used as containers in microwave ovens24. Low-level exposure to BPA inhibits the release of adiponectin from human adipose (fat) tissue. Adiponectin increases insulin sensitivity and helps regulate glucose metabolism25. The researchers hypothesized that environmental BPA exposure may increase susceptibility to obesity and diabetes. It is found that urinary BPA levels in humans were associated with increased prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease26. BPA is banned in some products, but many other plastic additives

are also endocrine disrupters.  The problem, Wagner explains, is that many different chemicals are added to plastics and we have very limited scientific understanding of their toxicity and effects on human health. According to Wagner very little research has been conducted on additives in bioplastics and their toxicity. “It is an unknown field,” he says.

The Hong Kong had suffered from contaminant effects of plastic items made from the substandard materials. The Legislative Council of Hong Kong has urged for controls on toys containing toxic substance linked to liver and kidney damage after finding high levels of it in over half the toys it tested. The Press clipping appeared in the electronic media clarifies as under:

The Legislative Council is considering amending the Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance to introduce control over phthalates in toys. “From a scientific perspective, the danger of phthalates to humans is still up for debate … but it is not too late for Hong Kong to enact stricter regulation, “said Professor Michael Hui King-man, chairman of the council’s publicity and community relations committee. The samples tested included bath toys, toys designed for youngsters to ride on and an alphabet puzzle board. Meanwhile, the council also warned consumers of a series of safety hazards in unbranded Christmas lights, saying some were “probably too good a bargain to be true”. A joint test conducted by the council and the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department on 17 Christmas lights – four unbranded and 13 branded – found all four unbranded samples failed safety compliance regulations for electrical products.”

The government of the Hong Kong seriously considered health and safety issues of children and has promulgated “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” in 1993 (the “Ordinance 1993”) to provide safety standards for children’s toys and safety standards for specified chattels. In the Ordinance special powers have been conferred to ensure products of children to be safe.27 The Ordinance 1993 has exhaustively reviewed the sub-standards materials used in manufacturing of children products starting from the categorization of products to safety standards which are enumerated in its Schedule 2. The Ordinance has emphasized with procedural lapses by incorporating prohibition clauses, requirements for standards, general and additional safety standards and its laboratory testing, Additional Controls, Penalties and enforcement powers were part of the legislation. The Ordinance 1993 has recommended the International Standards28, European Standards29 and ASTM

Standards30 to be observed as a vital requirement for the products manufactured in the Hong Kong.

The study conducted in India about the harmful effects of incinerated articles, used in different toys, revealed vast degradation effects on society. It states the Infection at doorstep when plastic parts of used syringes are either dumped or burnt in the location where vaccination is being administered, or are sold to local scrap dealers. Hospital solid plastic waste has huge recyclable potential as this is made up of virgin plastic, which has high market value. This was the reason why both earlier and the new Rules refer to disinfection and shredding of infected plastic waste before selling to recyclers. Instead, in most cases hospitals sell the infected plastic waste directly to scrap dealers. The study further shows that burning of any kind of degradable waste should not be encouraged, burning plastics which are non-degradable, release harmful chemicals can aggravate existing health conditions and lead to cancer in the long run. Incinerating plastic is a very serious health hazard, mainly because of two very toxic chemicals that are released on incineration, namely, Dioxene and Furon, which affect human organs. Current research indicates that burning plastic waste can increase the risk of heart disease, asthma, and emphysema,31 therefore the compliance of standard to be maintained while performing processes like segregation, collection, transport, storage, and final disposal of biomedical wastes.

In USA research reveals the effects of use of plastic particularly in toddlers. The study states it’s worth noting that the phthalates32 that were banned in toys continue to be used in many other products that children come in contact with on a regular basis such as children’s back-to-school supplies. Phthalates are also used in wide variety of consumer products, including cosmetics, personal care products, pharmaceutical, medical devices, children’s toys, food packaging, and cleaning and building materials. People may be exposed to phthalates through ingestion, inhalation, absorption through the skin, or parenteral administration. They have been linked to birth defects and are harmful to reproductive system33. An investigation into children’s school supplies found in USA shows that 80% of children’s school supplies tested contained phthalates, and 75% of all children’s school supplies tested contained levels of phthalates so high they would not be allowed in toys. It recommended that safer plastics for toys include those made out of polyethylene polymers, polypropylene and biobased materials. In October 18, 2017 after a decade-long process and a lawsuit brought by the Natural

Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Justice Health Alliance and Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, the Consumer Product Safety Commission voted to ban five more harmful phthalate chemicals from plastic used in children’s toys and child care articles. 34

In Pakistan, more than two decade after Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 have been passed, the country has not yet enacted laws to prohibit use of recycled hospital waste into manufacturing of toys, plastic utensils and other products. Around 250,000 tons of medical waste is annually produced from all sorts of health care facilities in Pakistan. Some hospitals and municipalities burn their waste, which results in the production of large amount of highly toxic gases35. The recycled items, from the plastic available in the markets, show that the adequate steps have not been taken by the authorities to prevent/forbidding use of recycled plastic.

The federal and provincial governments have made legislation to conserve environment, biodiversity, eco-system and health care of the public with safety standards. The Punjab Environment Protection (Amendment) Act 2012 (the “Act 2012”)36 was promulgated to achieve objectives of right to have decent environment and different provisions of the Act regulate process and procedure for adaptation37 and recommend stern action against the violators. Environmental degradation has been addressed by the courts thought its judgments and law38. The definition clause of the Act 2012 include the adverse environmental effects, if caused to human health and safety by impairment of or damage to or to biodiversity or property in shape of hazardous substances from the hospital waste etc. Apart from the Act ibid, although the Hospital Waste Management Rules 2014 (the “Hospital Rules 2014”)39 are there but it neither addresses the toxic effects of recycled hospital waste used in the manufacturing of toys and in other house hold items nor the same impose any restrictions or ban on the use of recycled plastic in toys that seriously risk the human health and life.

 

The Hospital Rules 2014 are not strict enough to adhere by hospitals. All hospitals don’t have incineration facility which is essential for safe disposal of toxic waste. There are no provisions in these Rules for hospitals to strictly ensure that hospitals should immediately dispose of their toxic waste in safe mode. The Rule 20 (5) of the Rules ibid states about the operation of incinerator by hospitals after securing environmental approval under section 12 of the Act 2012 but said rule is silent about the record to be kept by every hospital of such disposal facility and handling of toxic waste with the capacity of incinerator under use.

 

Moreover, there is no safe mode to ensure that such hospital waste is not to be sold in the

market to make granules or plastic pallets. The disposal of such waste by hospitals without

proper incineration has contributed in causing hazardous effects to society.

 

The amazing fact is that there is no comprehensive parliamentary legislation till date to restrict the use of recycled plastic or even some standards for the products of children from plastic. Absence of such legislation has adversely effected human health. The legislature should focus the need of hour for health and safety of our children by making laws to effectively monitor the recycled hospital waste.

The import of hospital waste into the country is too a serious issue and if it is not addressed appropriately shall risk health and safety of the people too. The Basel Convention40 on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal is the most important regulatory framework for the management of hazardous waste which also restricts the hazardous waste movements in cross borders. As adaptation, all items made from these recycled plastic material should be banned immediately and there entry into the country should not be allowed except those items manufactured from the virgin plastic as per standards.

*The writer is an environmental lawyer and activist practicing in corporate, commercial and constitutional law. He has worked in the field of environment for more than a decade and has acted as pro bono publico too by filing constitutional petitions on different environmental issues. Apart from this, he is visiting faculty, teaching environmental laws, in the University of the Punjab. The Article published in law journal CLD 2019.

* This paper reflects the personal views of the author.

  1. Waste classified as being hazardous when display one or more radioactive or hazardous properties, including explosive, oxidizing, flammable, irritant, toxic, carcinogenic and harmful effects https://www.intechopen.com/books/management-of-hazardous-wastes/the-management-of-hazardous-waste-in-developing-countries

 1A. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling John N. Hahladakis a,∗, Costas A. Velis a,∗, Roland Weber b, Eleni Iacovidoua, Phil Purnell, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT, Leeds, United Kingdom, Journel of Hazardous Materials 344 (2018) 179-199

  1.  R. Rijk, K. Ehlert, Final Report. Migration of Phthalate Plasticizers from Soft PVC Toys and Child Care Articles. TNO Report V3932. EU Contract No. EDT/00/503303, TNO Nutrition and Food Research, Zeist, 2001.
  1.  J.E. Tønning, K. Pedersen, E. Nilsson, NH, Phthalates in products that children are in direct contact with. Danish Technological Institute. Survey of chemical substances in consumer products, No. 109210. Danish Ministry of the Environment and EPA. http://www.mst.dk/Publikationer/Publications/ 2010/12/978-87-92708-75-5.htm (Accessed 24 February 2011), (2010).
  1. Y.-J. Kim, M. Osako, S.-i. Osako, Leaching characteristics of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from flame-retardant plastics, Chemosphere 65 (2006) 506–513.
  1. C. Brede, P. Fjeldal, I. Skjevrak, H. Herikstad, Increased migration levels of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles after dishwashing, boiling and brushing, Food Addit. Contam. 20 (2003) 684–689.
  1.  Sajiki, F. Miyamotoa, H. Fukatabc, C. Mori, J. Yonekubode, K. Hayakawae, A. Bisphenol, (BPA) and its source in foods in Japanese markets, Food Addit. Contam.: Part A 24 (2007) 103–112.
  1. N. Olea, R. Pulgar, P. Pérez, F. Olea-Serrano, A. Rivas, A.e.a. Novillo-Fertrell, Estrogenicity of resinbased composites and sealants used in dentistry, Environ. Health Perspect. 104 (1996) 298–305.
  1.  M.H. Al-Malack, Migration of lead from unplasticized polyvinyl chloride pipes, J. Hazard. Mater. 82 (2001) 263–274.
  1. M. Mutsuga, Y. Kawamura, Y. Sugita-Konishi, Y. Hara-Kudo, K.T.K. Takatori, Migration of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde into mineral water in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles, Food Addit. Contam. 23 (2006) 212–218.
  1.  A. Fernandes, M. Rose, C. Charlton, 4-Nonylphenol (NP) in food-contact materials: analytical methodology and occurrence, Food Addit. Contam. 25 (2008) 364–372.
    1. I. Skjevrak, A. Due, K.O. Gjerstad, H. Herikstad, Volatile organic components migrating from plastic pipes (HDPE, PEX and PVC) into drinking water, Water Res. 37 (2003) 1912–1920.
    2. C. Hennesuse-Boxus, T. Pacary, Emissions from Plastics. Rapra Review Reports, Report 161, vol.14, no 5. Rapra Technology, Rapra Technology Limited, Shrewsbury, (2003).
    3. A. Kortenkamp, Ten years of mi
    4. Toxic effects of plastic on human health and environment: A consequences of health risk assessment in Bangladesh by Ram Proshad, Tapos Kormoker, Md. Saiful Islam, Mohammad Asadul Haque, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman, Md. Mahabubur Rehman Mithu. International Journal of Health, 6 (1) (2018) 1-5
    1.  D. Lihner, J. Damberg, G. Dave and A. Larsson, Leachates from Plastic Consumer Products-Screening for Toxicity with Daphnia Magna Chemosphere, 74, 1195-1200 (2009)
    2.  Haphazard disposable of non degradable waste reaches a disturbing high: Emissions from Plastics, a burning issue. http://www.sundayobserver.Ik/2016/12/18/features/haphazard-disposable-non-degradable-waste-reaches-disturbing-high-emissions
    1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste 
    2.  https://www.plasticstoday.com/medical/medical-waste-chinese-hospitals-may-have-been-recycled-plastic-toys/93215465447187
    3. Research on Mixed and Classification Simulation Models of Medical Waste-A Case Study in Beijing, China by Hao Liu and Zhong Yao
    4.  https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste
    5. The Management of Hazardous Waste in Developing Countries by Daniel Mmereki, Adrew Baldwin, Liu Hong and Baizhan Li. https://www.intechopen.com/books/management-of-hazardous-wastes/the-management-of-hazardous-waste-in-developing-countries
    6. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste
    7. By Syed Mustafa Ali of University of Chichester under guidance of Wenping Wang, Muhammad Nawaz Chaudhry, Yong Geng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, June 2017
    8. (Toxigenic effects of plastics on human health by Noorpur Mahur, N. Mathur and A. Singh, Issn 0972-768x)
    9.  Eric Hugo, D. Terry Brandebourg, Jessica G. Woo et al., Bishphenol A at Environmentally Relevant Doses Inhibits Adiponectin Release from Human Adipose Tissue Explants and Adipocytes, Environmental Health Persective, 116 (12), 1642-1647 (2008).
    10. Lain A. Lang, Tamara S. Galloway, Alan Scarlett et al. Association of Urinary Bisphenol a Concentration with Medical Disorders and Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults, JAMA, September 17, 300(11), 1303-1310 (2008).
    11.  Preamble of “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” 1 July 1993 L.N.240 of 1993 [Enacting provisions omitted—E.R. 2 of 2012] [Format changes—E.R. 2 of 2012; E.R. I of 2015]
    12.  International Standard is established by the International Organization for Standardization and International Enforcement Commission, and the requirements contained in the Standard are specified in ISOs categorized on different safety aspects related to mechanical and physical properties. Schedule 1 of “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” 1 July 1993 L.N.240 of 1993.
    13. European Standard (inclusive of Australian Standard) is established by the European Committee for Standardization, and the requirements contained in the Standards specified in BS EN with its mechanical and physical properties, Schedule 1 of “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” 1 July 1993 L.N.240 of 1993.
    14.  ASTM Standard is established by ASTM International, and the requirements contained in the Standard are specified in ASTM F 963-17 Standard consumer safety specification for toy safety, Schedule 1 of “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” 1 July 1993 L.N.240 of 1993.
    15. Over 40 per cent of bio-medical waste generated in Jharkhand goes untreated, seriously endangering public health: CSE’s new study. https://www.cseindia.org/over-40-per-cent-of-bio-medical-waste-generated-in-jharkhand-goes-untreated-seriously-endangering-public-health-cse-6847
    16.  Phthalates are chemicals that are often used to soften or “plasticize” vinyl products. PVC cannot be made soft and flexible without adding plasticizers such as phthalates to the polymer.
    17. European Standard (inclusive of Australian Standard) is established by the European Committee for Standardization, and the requirements contained in the Standards specified in BS EN with its mechanical and physical properties, Schedule 1 of “Toys and Children’s Products Safety Ordinance” 1 July 1993 L.N.240 of 1993
    18. The Shocking Truth About Children’s Plastic Toys. Read This before You Buy Another Toy! https://safebabyhealthchild.com/the-shocking-truth-about-child….
    19.  Ref. Hospital Waste Management in Pakistan, Case Study Report Special Waste Fractions: Hospital Waste, Rehan Ahmad, August 1997) The State of Pakistan’s Economy
    20.  Manual of Environmental Laws In Pakistan by Jawad Hassan, Edition 2018, Page 1
    21. Asghar Leghari Vs. Federation of Pakistan (2018 CLD 424, Lahore) by CJ Syed Mansoor Ali Shah (The landmark Judgment by CJ on climate justice with adaptation to climate change)
    22. The Handbook on Environmental Law by Justice Ayesh A Malik (The handbook is a guide seeking to elaborate the most basic principle and practices required of us to steer things in the right direction. A guide on how to employ existing resources, innovatively, to achieve the end of sustainable development)

    23. Notification No.F.No.1218-18/G/LS. Dated 11 February 2015
    24. Basel Convention was adopted on 22 March 1989 and entered into force on the ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, formal confirmation, approval or accession, on 5 May 1992.

Legislative measures on POPs

By Muhammad Yasin Hatif*

LL.M. (London)

Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan

 

Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) are hazardous chemicals1 which persist in the environment and are sources of diseases. They are group of chemicals which are very toxic and can lead to negative health effects both in male and females2 causing endocrine disruption3, cancer, birth defects, affecting reproductive system and synergistic effects on them at large. People and animals are exposed to POPs mostly through their diet as they accumulate4 in the fatty tissues which don’t degrade quickly over the time and these POPs travel vast distances via air and water. 

 

To restrict the production, storage, usage and improper disposal of the POPs, the international community conducted the Stockholm Convention5 on 22 May 2001 which was entered into force on 17 May 2004 (the “Stockholm Convention”).

 

POPs exert negative effects6 on the environment through the processes of long range transport, bioaccumulation and bio magnification and over 90% of exposure comes from animal product foods due to its bioaccumulation in the fat tissues.

 

Initially the Stockholm Convention recognized only twelve POPs which were called as “Dirty Dozen” for their adverse effects on human health and the environment like Aldrin, Chlordane, Dieldrin, Dioxins Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), etc. but subsequently this list was updated with further addition in it counting to 26 in numbers7 in different period of the years.

 

POPs pose particular threat to the human being due to consumption of contaminated marine mammal8 species in traditional diets. The Stockholm Convention requires parties to take measures to eliminate or reduce the release of POPs in the environment. In the Asia-Pacific Region POPs can easily cross national boundaries, from the developed countries despite international restriction under Basel and Stockholm Convention, which has caused the extensive use of toxic /hazardous substances in these countries which really is a challenging issue requiring evidence-based policymaking and stringent legislation there. More consistent and integrated approach could strengthen national, regional and sub-regional control of trans boundary movements and transportation of POPs by effective monitoring, sound management and stern action.

 

The Stockholm Convention was based on two earlier international treaties i.e. the Basel Convention in 1989 on the control of Trans boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their disposal and secondly the Rotterdam Convention in 1998 on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in international trade with broader scope to conserve humans and environment from being exposed to adverse effects of hazardous chemicals and wastes. Keeping in view these conventions in mind the United Nations Environment Program Governing Council in the year 1997 established an intergovernmental negotiating committee to develop a legal binding international agreement on POPs and Unintentional Production of POPs (UPOPs) which led to the adoption of Stockholm Convention. The earlier two Conventions are still in field with addition of Stockholm Convention which addresses to control the production, usage, trade, stockpiles and release of POPs with certain restrictions and exceptions to them.

 

In order to ensure the coherent and effective control of POPs, the Stockholm Convention9 adopted the Precautionary approach set forth in Article 1 of the Convention which was previously adopted in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development to protect human health and environment. The Convention requires parties to develop respective national legal framework in consonance with the Convention’s objectives.

 

Although Pakistan has ratified the Stockholm Convention but after 18th Amendment the subject of Environment was devolved upon the Provinces to promulgate respective laws in consonance with the constitutional and legislative requirements and further to give effect to the international commitments. The existing legislation, in current scenario, requires robust regulatory measures to make policies in context to Convention’s objectives.

 

Pakistan has to design, establish and implement effective and efficient legal framework that will ensure the environmentally sound management of the POPs. The existing legal and institutional framework for chemical management is not compatible with the international regulatory measures so required under the Stockholm Convention.  Legislation governing the remediation of land and water on contaminated sites, which addresses POPs, is also missing amidst the legislative measures which are vital for the cleaning up of sites affected by POPs as a consequent of pollution causing activity.

 

POPs released into the environment in shape of pesticides for plant protection efforts, usage in shape of oils, as dielectric and cooling fluids in capacitors and transformers, for wood preservation etc. with chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and pentachlorophenol which either spills or evaporate in the environment. Although, in agricultural sector, “The Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971 (the Agricultural Ordinance) in Punjab, which was amended subsequently in other provinces too, is over there which regulate the import, manufacture, formulation, sale, distribution and use of pesticides with permission in shape of license but such Agricultural legislation neither speaks about the handling of POPs in the country nor the same apply to pesticides that are consider to be POPs. Such legislation does not include the assessment criteria of risks to human health and the environment that are presented by specific pesticides.

 

Wastes containing POPs are regarded as hazardous wastes including pesticides with specific composition. Section 13 & 14 of the Punjab Environment Protection Act 1997 (Amended in 2012) restrict the import of hazardous waste in to the province except with the permission to generate, collect, consign, transport, treat, dispose of, store, handle or import under a license from the competent authority. The definition provided under the aforesaid Act ousts the POPs in category of Pesticides as defined in the Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance, 1971 (II of 1971). Under Stockholm Convention the purpose of hazardous waste legislation was to protect human health and the environment from the risk of adverse impacts due to improper management of wastes.

 

Pakistan has not developed plan to compile national inventory of all chemicals yet or even has not adopted UN’s Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of classification and labeling of chemicals inside the country which system is the internationally agreed-upon standards managed by the United Nations. National chemicals and hazardous waste policy is a dream in the country along with its implementation plan. Although Pakistan aims to promulgate legislation to control chemicals being imported into and exported outside the country but still a potential work is missing to legislate on policy, regulations and on an Act to control the hazardous substances.

The enactment process in Pakistan requires priority actions under an appropriate legal and regulatory framework in order to address the POPs which is missing in the national environment agenda to meet the requirements of Stockholm Convention. 

 

* The writer is an environmental lawyer and activist practicing in corporate, commercial and constitutional law. He has worked in the field of environment for more than a decade and has acted as pro bono publico too by filing constitutional petitions on different environmental issues. Apart from this, he is visiting faculty, teaching environmental laws, in the University of the Punjab. The Article published in the law journal “PLD Journal 2021”.

Constitutional rights intertwined with environmental rights

Muhammad Yasin Hatif*

LL.M. (London)

Advocate Supreme Court

Human rights are the basic rights guaranteed by most constitutions of the world. These are the supreme rights ever granted to the human beings like right to life, liberty, freedom of movement and property etc. and supersede all other rights or even the laws inconsistent with or in derogation of fundamental rights have been declared illegal and void by the courts of the country. The Environmental rights are associated with the fundamental rights which cannot be enjoyed unless both are conferred. Without a healthy environment, we are unable to fulfil our aspirations. We may not have access to even the minimum standards of human dignity, so the fundamental rights and the environmental rights are interlinked to each other.

Human rights are part of nature, and our human rights are intertwined with the environment in which we live. Environmental harms interferes with the enjoyment of human rights, and the exercise of human rights helps to protect the environment and to promote the sustainable development.1

Now the question arises “Whether Article 9 & 14 of Constitution of Pakistan 1973 is sufficient to protect the environmental rights of the citizens, while these Articles relates to fundamental rights of the citizens too? 

Article 9 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 has vast meaning, alongwith Article 14, covering most valuable right of “right to life”. Although, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in plethora of judgments has covered the environmental rights in vast canvas either by using the words “right to life” “the right to a healthy environment was part of the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 of the Pakistan Constitution, 

respectively”2 or the “decent environment”3 but comparing with other countries constitution those clearly postulates the grant of environmental rights in unequivocal terms. Environmental right, on the other hand, is the term used to describe both existing human rights with environmental implications and emerging right to a clean and healthy environment.4

The word “right to life” was given vital meaning by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its landmark judgment5 and the Word “life” also could not be confined to mere vegetable or animal existence, but it includes the right to all amenities and facilities which a person born in a free country was entitled to enjoy with dignity. Article 9 & 14 of the Constitution had guaranteed the right to life and human dignity6 which postulates that every citizen has the right to unpolluted environment and clean atmosphere and the Hon’ble court in that case decided that right to life means right to particular quality of life. The word “life” is also very significant as it covers all facts of human existence like right to have water free from pollution and contamination.7, right to enjoy public park8, right to secure life from hazardous waste and dangers etc. Article 9 of the Constitution protects life of citizens and where life of a citizen was degraded, quality of life was adversely affected and health hazards were created affecting large number of people, the same amounts to deprivation of life which was prohibited by Article 9 & 14 of the Constitution9.

The right to a healthy environment has developed gradually since the 1970s when it was first alluded to by the 1972 Stockholm Declaration. Its first Principle states: “Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an

environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being”.10

Protecting human rights protects the environment. Human rights are universal and inalienable. All people everywhere in the world are entitled to them. No one can voluntarily give them up. Nor can others take them away from him or her.11 Human rights are relevant to every aspect of our lives. They are central for human dignity and our shared vision for a better world for all. They are key to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals.12 All human beings depend on the environment in which we live. A safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment is integral to the full enjoyment of a wide range of human rights, including the rights to life, health, food, water and sanitation.13

In the landmark decision in Shehla Zia vs. WAPDA, the Supreme Court of Pakistan held that the right to a clean and healthy environment was part of the Fundamental Right to life guaranteed by Article 9 of the Constitution and the Fundamental Right to dignity provided in Article 14.14 read with Constitutional principles of democracy, equality, social, economic and political justice included within their ambit and commitment, the international environmental principle of sustainable development, precautionary principle, environmental impact assessment, inter and intragenerational equity and public trust doctrine.15 and where there is any complaint that the government’s conduct violated their fundamental rights16 guaranteed under Article 9 (right of life liberty), Article 14 (right of dignity), the courts have rescued the

aggrieved person while exercising constitutional jurisdiction under the right to life and right of dignity.

Human rights and the environment are intertwined; human rights cannot be enjoyed without a safe, clean and healthy environment; and sustainable environmental governance cannot exist without the establishment of and respect for human rights. This relationship is increasingly recognized, as the right to a healthy environment is enshrined in over 100 constitutions.17 The human rights, enshrined in the Constitution of Pakistan, therefore, are interlaced to environmental rights and without having such rights environmental rights cannot be regarded.  

  1. “Framework Principles on Human Rights and the Environment” by John H. Knox, UN Special Repporteur on Human Rights and Environment. UN Human Rights Council March 2018.
  1. PLD 1994 SC 693
  2. PLD 2011 SC 619
  3. A.E.Boyle & M.R. Anderson (eds.) Human rights approaches to environmental protection. P.89
  4. PLD 1994 Supreme Court 693 [In this case, four citizens protested to WAPDA against the construction of grid station with high voltage transmission lines in Green-belt of a residential locality in Islamabad. The Supreme Court prevented the establishment of the high voltage grid stations by directing necessary measures.]
  5. 2004 CLC Kar. 1353
  6. 2013 SCMR 594 & 2004 YLR 2077 Kar.
  7. 2007 CLC 1358 Kar.
  8. PLD 2007 Lahore 403.

10.https://www.iucn.org/news/world-commission-environmental-law/202110/right-a-healthy-environment

11.https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/what-are-human-rights

12.https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/UNHumanRights_CfS_cmyk_online.pdf

13.https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-environment/about-human-rights-and-environment

14.“Development of Environmental Justice” by Justice Ayesha A Malik, Supreme Court of Pakistan

  1. Asghar Leghari Vs. Federation of Pakistan, Before Justice. Syed Mansoor Ali Shah (2018 CLD 424 Lhr)
  2. Sheikh Asim Farooq Vs. FOP, (PLD 2019 Lhr 664) by Justice Jawad Hassan, Lahore High Court, Lahore

17.https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/environmental-rights-and-governance/what-we-do/advancing-environmental-rights/what

* The writer is an environmental lawyer and activist practicing in corporate, commercial and constitutional law. He has worked in the field of environment for more than a decade and has acted as pro bono publico too by filing constitutional petitions on different environmental issues. Apart from this, he is visiting faculty, teaching environmental laws, in the University of the Punjab.

Hatif Chambers,
G-Floor, 9-Fane Road, Lahore, Pakistan.

Contact Us

We are Social

Copyright ©️ 2022 ReviewsPapers. All rights reserved. Powered by: Techqode
X